Everyone is generally knowledgeable about the impressionists. Van Gogh, Cezanne, Degas, Seurat, Monet, and it goes on. Their styles are not identical but can loosely be grouped together due to their similar use of color, light, etc. Probably less familiar is the movement known as Naturalism and Realism. As it sounds, these artist depicted things as they were. With political undertones, regular people were being capture plowing fields, etc. Millet and Courbet spearheaded those movements. Illya Repin from Russia dabbled in all three, really. You don't see distinct styles, but rather an overlay in Viennese art. Vienna art at the time was dominated by the classical modes of art--the Academy, the government, ancient conventions. With an abundance of foreign import, like impressionism and Art Noveau, a group of artists wanted to create art for arts sake. They felt art shouldn't be dictated by the Academy, as such, they succeeded forming the Secessionist movement.
Here's a quote that adequately describes their purpose: "...culminate in the recognition of the necessity of bringing artistic life in Vienna into more lively contact with the continuing development of art abroad, and of putting exhibitions on a purely artistic footage, free from an commercial considerations; of thereby awakening in wider circles a purified modern view of art; and lastly, of inducing a heightened concern for art in official circle." This group organized their own exhibitions, in a building of their own, called the Secession Building. It is a temple of sorts. It's architecture even reflects their reverence for art. Above the doorway, their beliefs are inscribed: "Der Zeit ihre Kunst, der Kunst ihre Freiheit." In English, "To every age it's art, to art's it's freedom." Secessionists believed in art changing over time.
Art Noveau influence on the side here. The outline is in green, which you can't really see that well. The edge of the roof also had this undulating edge, which was really cool.
Those are turtles under the urn! Turtles!
And a view of the whole building. The below photo is not mine, but taken from here.
Many Viennese disliked the building, since surrounding it are buildings of the Ringstrasse period, which conglomerated styles like Baroque, classicism, etc. It was sometimes called the glowing cabbage or Mahdi's tomb. Built by Joseph Maria Olbrich in 1897, the building was perfect for Secessionists exhibitions. One such exhibition dedicated to Beethoven as the ultimate artists featured a frieze by Gustav Klimt. Completed in two months, Klimt depicts the 9th symphony. We've seen Klimt before..
These were wall pieces done about ten years before the Beethoven Frieze. Note the realistic body shapes of the women. Though seemingly in line with the aims of the Academy, there's a sort of brilliance here. Klimt incorporates and layers symbols to tell a story in the tiny awkward space he was given. The frieze is different. Rather than filling every space with paint, there are large deliberate spaces of clean, empty wall. Characteristic of Klimt later and other Secessionist artists, you'll see more of this "space" I'm talking about in my next post about the Belvedere where I saw quite a bit of Klimt.
Klimt was a major force for the Secessionists movement. He was financially stable, wealthy even, famous, well-known. His exhibitions also featured newer, less renowned artists, which is quite decent of him. While breaking away from the established Academy would have been easier for Klimt as an established, famous, wealthy artists, I feel it would be harder, riskier for less established artists. In my mind, I am less impressed with Klimt's seccession due to his wealth. Financial wealth allows for creative freedom.
This year is the 150th birthday of Klimt. Every decent museum is doing an exhibition of his work. The Kunsthistorisches even built a temporary bridge to view the above paintings. Likewise, the Secessionists building build a ramp to view his frieze better. A frieze, just in case you weren't sure, is a border of either sculpture or fresco that is decorates and lines an object, generally a room at the ceiling, or a Grecian temple, or a coffin. His frieze was originally meant to be destroyed but a Jewish art lover purchased the frieze. Heavily damaged and repossessed during WW2, the frieze took around 10 years to be restored. It is now displayed in the basement rather than it's original placement. Though a fresco, Klimt used other mediums such as gold, shells, etc. We were not allowed to take pictures within the room due to our close proximity to the fresco. So I went a Googelin'.
This is what the room looks like without the platform (Image from here). And now a closer look at each wall. If you want to listen to Beethoven's 9th symphony which the frieze is derived from, click here.
"Klimt's Frieze was based on Wagner's interpretation of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, celebrating humankind's 'struggle on the most magnificent level by the soul striving for joy', reached in the unification of all arts. The fresco, beginning at the left, forms a cohesive narrative.
On the first wall [above] we encounter the Floating Genii, gliding female figures symbolizing 'Longing for Happiness'. They are followed by Suffering Humanity, a naked kneeling couple and a standing girl. Suffering Humanity offer their pleas to the Knight in Shining Armour, who stands for the external driving forces. The female figures behind him, Compassion and Ambition, represent internal motivation moving him to take up the fight for happiness."
"The short end wall [above] is devoted to the Hostile Forces, the giant Typhoeus and his daughters, the three gorgons. Above them are Sickness, Madness and Death. To Typhoeus' right are Lasciviousness, Wantonness and Intemperance with the cowering Nagging Care beyond. The yearnings and desires of humankind fly past them."
[The dress worn by the standing figure, Poetry, is an actual dress created and designed by Klimt's lover at the time. She held salons in Vienna and was a famous fashion boutique owner. Her designs were breathable since no corset was worn and decorated with patterns and beautiful fabric. ]
"On the final wall [above] the yearning for happiness finds appeasement in Poetry (the figure with lyre). An empty segment in the frieze, where a wall opening revealed a view of Klinger's statue in the 1902 exhibition, is followed by The Arts: five female figures representing the 'ideal realm', a place of 'pure joy, pure happiness, pure love’. The frieze concludes with a choir of angels 'singing in paradise' and the powerful image of a kissing couple."
**Please note the words in quotes are not mine. My comments are bracketed by these thingies: []. The text is from an article I found on the Tate website. It details what our tour guide told us which I can't remember in full detail. The images, likewise, are not mine. I found them here.**
I was interested in that the female figures are distorted in a way. Even the ones representing things other than death and envy, the female physique, and the man's for that matter, is odd. I asked our tour guide, why, when Klimt could obviously render the human form realistically, would he choose to do so in that manner? It was deliberate, and I want to know why. Our tour guide wasn't helpful so when I get home, I plan on doing some research.
After the Secessionist building, we ventured over to two buildings that Wagoner, an architect I've mentioned before who built the Art Noveau Kirche am Steinhof for the psychiatric hospital, and Klimt collaborated on. In front of them is where the Naschmarkt, the famous food market with restaurants and food stalls lining the street for blocks followed by the flea market (a freakin' fabulous flea market). People actually live there! Which is why we couldn't go in and take pictures, but how cool is that to live in one of the below buildings?
Compare those Art Noveau inspired buildings to the baroque one below. The entire street looks like this building below and other neo-classical buildings, then you have these two buildings with flowers and plants and gold all over them. It was a neat contrast.
Tomorrow, I'll write a post detailing my visit to the Belvedere where we saw more Klimt and other Secessionists. Again, we weren't allowed to take pictures within so I'll talk about a few paintings. Oh, an original version of the famous David painting of Napoleon was in there! This one...
from here.
And as I promised, I snagged a few opera pics from my friends.
First one: from Hannah Osbourne, Second one: from Tenzin Dekyi







